COMPREHENSIVE SCHOOL REFORM
AND ACHIEVEMENT:
A META-ANALYSIS*

   

Geoffrey Borman, Gina Hewes,
Laura Overman, & Shelly Brown
Review of Educational Research

Last updated October 1, 2006
The Best Evidence Encyclopedia

EDUCATOR’S SUMMARY

Which comprehensive school reform programs have been proven to help elementary and secondary students achieve? To find out, this review summarizes evidence on comprehensive school reform (CSR) models in elementary and secondary schools. Comprehensive school reform models are programs used schoolwide to improve student achievement. They typically include the following elements:

  • Innovative approaches to instruction and curriculum used in many subjects throughout the school
  • Extensive, ongoing professional development, and coaches or facilitators in the building to help manage the reform process
  • Measurable goals and benchmarks for student achievement
  • Emphasis on parent and community involvement

CSR models are developed and supported by national organizations, mostly nonprofits, that provide professional development, materials, and support to networks of schools.

For program ratings and contact information click here
For a description of review methods click here
For connections to related reviews click here

Program Ratings

Summary of Evidence Supporting Beginning Reading Programs

Program Ratings (Beginning Reading Programs)

Strongest Evidence of Effectiveness
Direct Instruction - www.nifdi.org
School Development Program - www.schooldevelopmentprogram.org
Success for All - www.successforall.org

Highly Promising Evidence of Effectiveness
Expeditionary Learning Outward Bound - www.elob.org
Modern Red Schoolhouse - www.mrsh.org
Roots & Wings - www.successforall.org
Promising Evidence of Effectiveness
Accelerated Schools - www.acceleratedschools.net
America’s Choice - www.ncee.org
ATLAS Communities - www.atlascommunities.org
Montessori - www.montessori.com
Paideia - www.unc.edu/paideia
The Learning Network
Greatest Need for Additional Research
Audrey Cohen - www.audrey-cohen.edu
Center for Effective Schools - www.centerforeffectiveschools.org
Child Development Project - www.devstu.org/cdp
Coalition of Essential Schools - www.essentialschools.org
Community for Learning - www.temple.edu/lss/cfl.htm
Community Learning Centers
Co-nect - www.co-nect.net
Core Knowledge - www.coreknowledge.org
Different Ways of Knowing - www.differentways.org
Edison - www.edisonschools.com
High Schools That Work - www.sreb.org/Programs/hstw/hstwindex.asp
High/Scope - www.highscope.org
Integrated Thematic Instruction - www.kovalik.com
MicroSociety - www.microsociety.org
Onward to Excellence II - www.nwrel.org/scpd/ote
Talent Development High School - www.csos.jhu.edu/tdhs
Urban Learning Centers - www.urbanlearning.org

* Within categories, programs are listed in alphabetical order

Review Methods

Borman et al. included 29 CSR models that had been replicated in at least 10 schools and had been evaluated in at least one study. They did an extensive search for all types of studies. Studies were included if they met the following criteria:

  • Schools using each program had to be compared to equivalent control groups
  • Achievement data had to be sufficient to allow effect sizes to be computed
  • Schools had to be in the U.S.
  • Students had to be in the regular education program

CSR programs were rated in terms of the strength of their evidence of effectiveness in four categories:

Program Ratings
Strongest Evidence of Effectiveness
Highly Promising Evidence of Effectiveness
Promising Evidence of Effectiveness
Greatest Need for Additional Research

Programs were assigned to categories based on a combination of three criteria (Borman et al., 2003, p. 154):

  1. Quality of evidence: Does the CSR model have research evidence from control-group studies and third-party control group studies?
  2. Quantity of evidence: Does the CSR model have a relatively large number of studies? (10 studies overall and 5 third-party studies were required to be in the top category)
  3. Statistically significant and positive results: Does the evidence from control-group studies show effects that are significantly positive?

Connections

For a more recent review of research on elementary CSR models, see CSRQ, 2005 (http://www.csrq.org/es_form.asp). In late 2006, CSRQ will also issue a review of research on middle and high school CSR models. Finally, see CSRQ, 2006 for a review of research on educational service providers, such as Edison Schools (http://www.csrq.org/esp_form.asp).

* Full report published in the Review of Educational Research, 2003, Vol. 73, No. 2, pp. 125-230. Available online at http://www.successforall.net/_images/pdfs/Borman_CSR_meta_RER.pdf

 
     

 

 

Back to Homepage Elementary Math Word Doc Printer Friendly Word Doc Back To Homepage