home about the BEE review methods sign up for updates resources

Early Childhood / Early Childhood Education

This systematic review of research on early childhood programs seeks to identify effective approaches capable of improving literacy and language outcomes for preschoolers. It applies consistent standards to determine the strength of evidence supporting a variety of approaches, which fell into two main categories: balanced approaches, which include phonemic awareness, phonics, and other skills along with child-initiated activities, and developmental-constructivist approaches that focus on child-initiated activities with little direct teaching of early literacy skills. Inclusion criteria included use of randomized or matched control groups, evidence of initial equality, a minimum study duration of 12 weeks, and valid measures of literacy and language. Thirty-two studies evaluating 22 programs found that early childhood programs that have a balance of skill-focused and child-initiated activities programs had significant evidence of positive literacy and language outcomes at the end of preschool and on kindergarten follow-up measures. Effects were smaller and not statistically significant for developmental-constructivist programs.

Full Report
Chambers, B., Cheung, A., Slavin, R.E. (2015, September) Literacy and Language Outcomes of Balanced and Developmental-Constructivist Approaches to Early Childhood Education: A Systematic Review. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University, Center for Research and Reform in Education.


Click Here to sign up for
our Best Evidence in Brief




Full Report (NEW!)  (PDF,864 KB)


about CDDRE
privacy disclosure contact us site map
Back to Homepage Back to Homepage Johns Hopkins University School of Education Center for Data-Driven Reform in Education