home about the BEE review methods sign up for updates resources

Reading /Struggling Readers

Full Report pdf (2 MB) || Educator's Summary pdf (464 KB) || Educator's Guide pdf (584 KB)

Top-Rated Programs

Listed below are currently available programs.

Program Ratings
Strong Evidence of Effectiveness
Rating Program Type Description Contact / Website
strong evidence Success for All CIP+TT Provides extensive school staff training and materials focused on cooperative learning, phonics, and a rapid pace of instruction. Also provides tutoring to struggling children, mostly first graders.

E-mail: sfainfo@successforall.org
Website: www.successforall.org

strong evidence

Direct Instruction/ Corrective Reading

CIP,
SGT

A highly structured, phonetic approach to reading instruction that emphasizes phonics, a step-by-step instructional approach, and direct teaching of comprehension skills, as well as extensive professional development and follow-up.

E-mail: info@nifdi.org
Website: www.nifdi.org

strong evidence Peer Assisted Learning Strategies (PALS) CIP A technique in which children work in pairs, taking turns as teacher and learner, to learn a structured sequence of literacy skills, such as phonemic awareness, phonics, sound blending, passage reading, and story retelling. E-mail: pals@venderbilt.edu
Website: kc.vanderbilt.edu/pals
strong evidence Reading Recovery TT Provides the lowest achieving readers (lowest 20%) in first grade with supplemental tutoring in addition to their regular reading classes.

E-mail: info@readingrecovery.org
Website: www.readingrecovery.org

strong evidence Targeted Reading Intervention TT A one-to-one tutoring model in which classroom teachers work individually with struggling readers in kindergarten or first grade for 15 minutes a day. The 1-1 sessions focus on re-reading for fluency (2 min.), word work (6 min.), and guided oral reading (7 min.).

E-mail: lynnevf@email.unc.edu
Website: www.targetedreadingintervention.org


strong evidence Quick Reads SGT

A supplementary program designed to increase fluency, build vocabulary and background knowledge, and improve comprehension.

Website: www.quickreads.org
E-mail: quickreads@textproject.org

strong evidence One-to-One Teacher Tutoring with Phonics Emphasis* TT

Programs:
1) Auditory Discrimination in Depth (TT)
2) Early Steps/Howard Street Tutoring (TT)
3) Intensive Reading Remediation (TT)
4) Reading Rescue (TT)
5) Reading with Phonology (TT)

1) Website: www.lindamoodbell.com/programs/lips.html
2) E-mail: morrisrd@appstate.edu
3) E-mail: blachman@syr.edu
4) Website: www.literacytrust.org/rrprogram/index.htm
5) E-mail:crl@psych.york.ac.uk

strong evidence

One-to-One Paraprofessional/ Volunteer Tutoring with Phonics Emphasis*

T-Para/ Volunteer

Programs:
1) Sound Partners (T-Para)
2) The Reading Connection (T-Para)
3) SMART (T-Para)
4) Reading Rescue (T-Para)
5) Howard Street Tutoring (T-Para)
6) Book Buddies (T-Volunteer)

1) E-mail: partners@wri-edu.org
2) Website: www.thereadingconnection.org
3) Website: www.getsmartoregon.org
4) Website: www.literacytrust.org/rrprogram/index.htm
5) E-mail: morrisrd@appstate.edu
6) E-mail: mai@virginia.edu


Moderate Evidence of Effectiveness
Rating Program Type Description Contact / Website
moderate evidence Cooperative Integrated Reading and Composition (CIRC) CIP A cooperative learning program designed to help students develop metacognitive strategies for comprehending narrative and expository text. E-mail: sfainfo@successforall.org
Website: www.successforall.org

TT=One-to-One Tutoring by Teachers; T-Para/Volunteers=One-to-One Tutoring by Paraprofessionals and Volunteers; SGT=Small Group Tutorials; CIP=Classroom Instructional Process Approaches; CIP+T=Classroom Instructional Process Programs with Tutoring; IT=Instructional Technology.

* These are similar one-to-one tutoring programs. Each has evidence of effectiveness from studies with sample sizes too small to qualify for “strong evidence” on their own.

Evidence Rating:

See Review Methods for an explanation of Ratings.

strong evidenceStrong Evidence of Effectiveness

moderate evidenceModerate Evidence of Effectiveness

 

 
 
About CDDRE
Privacy Disclosure Contact Us Site Map
Back to Homepage Back to Homepage JHU SOE CDDRE